Jayapal’s Filibuster Stance Admittedly Aimed At Subverting American Democracy

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) admitted her stance on the Senate filibuster has been shaped by partisan goals. The chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus addressed her evolving position during a press conference Monday, explaining how it was tied to Democratic control of the Senate.

Jayapal previously advocated for abolishing the filibuster to pass progressive legislation. “Had we had the trifecta, I would have been [for eliminating the filibuster] because we have to show government can deliver,” she said.

Now, with Republicans likely to take control of Congress, Jayapal plans to rely on the filibuster to protect Democratic policies. Her comments underscore how shifting political power influences debates over the rule, which requires 60 votes for most legislation to advance.

Moderates like Sens. Joe Manchin (I-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) have consistently opposed eliminating the filibuster, arguing it stabilizes governance and promotes cooperation. Manchin has described the rule as critical to preventing partisanship from dominating Senate proceedings.

Jayapal has criticized the filibuster in the past, labeling it a “Jim Crow relic” and dedicating a section of her website to advocating for its removal. However, her recent remarks suggest her push for reform was rooted in advancing Democrat priorities rather than principle.

Her admission adds to the ongoing debate over the filibuster’s role in an increasingly divided government, illustrating how legislative rules often become tools of political strategy.

Previous articleForever Chemicals’ Crisis Threatens US Drinking Water
Next articleMark Cuban Deletes Pro-Kamala Harris Tweets Amid Post-Election Backlash