Historic preservation advocates are raising concerns about the rapid expansion of wind energy projects. They argue that these developments are endangering America’s cultural and historical landmarks, from New England’s coastline to Wyoming’s remote landscapes.
Idaho’s Lava Ridge Wind Project, approved by the Bureau of Land Management, will place turbines near the Minidoka National Historic Site. Critics say the turbines will diminish the site’s isolated atmosphere, which is key to understanding the trauma endured by Japanese Americans interned there during World War II.
Preservationists nationwide say that wind energy is harming America’s historic sites #ID #RI #WY: A pyramid in Wyoming, lighthouses in New England, and the site where Japanese-Americans were incarcerated in World War II are some of… https://t.co/8KV4F7K2LC #windpower #windenergy
— National Wind Watch (@windwatchorg) December 27, 2024
In Rhode Island, nearly 100 turbines are planned off the coast as part of the Revolution Wind project. The Preservation Society of Newport County claims the development will harm the area’s historic districts, which attract millions of visitors annually for their architectural and cultural significance.
"Preservationists nationwide say that wind energy is harming America’s historic sites" – Just The News #SmartNews https://t.co/73mtJ1kp2E
— Gene Melius (@gene_melius2) December 27, 2024
The Rail Tie Wind Project in Wyoming has sparked similar outcry. Preservationists say turbines will be built near the Ames National Monument, a granite structure commemorating the transcontinental railroad. Critics warn the project threatens 480 historic sites in the area, including indigenous cultural landmarks.
Power the Future’s Larry Behrens accused renewable energy proponents of hypocrisy, noting their selective opposition to projects impacting historic areas. He argued that green energy dollars often overshadow legitimate preservation concerns.
With turbines reaching up to 675 feet tall, the Rail Tie Project’s scope has drawn additional scrutiny for its potential to industrialize Wyoming’s prairies and disrupt its historical resources.
