In the wake of President Donald Trump’s 2024 re-election, the Washington Post has offered its liberal readers a guide on how to leave the United States. The piece outlines visa options for countries like Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom, aimed at Americans seeking an escape from the political climate.
The article, penned by Leo Sands and Vivian Ho, focuses on the “political outlook” and healthcare systems of potential destinations. Economic realities were notably absent, likely because they favor the US over many of the listed countries.
Washington Post offers advice on 'what it takes to immigrate' outside the US after Trump's victory https://t.co/XTKxE3WZ4O #FoxNews
— David Rutz (@DavidRutz) November 12, 2024
Jen Barnett, whose company helps Americans move abroad, reported a surge in interest following Trump’s win. She attributed the spike to concerns over political polarization and safety for marginalized groups, though historical trends suggest most such plans rarely come to fruition.
This guide comes amid internal unrest at the Post. Owner Jeff Bezos’ refusal to endorse Kamala Harris for president drew backlash from staff, some of whom resigned in protest. Opinion columnist Karen Attiah called the decision a betrayal of the paper’s values, though most employees stayed on.
Read "Washington Post offers advice on ‘what it takes to immigrate’ outside the US after Trump’s victory" on SmartNews: https://t.co/meS1Yz33vC #SmartNews
— Carol Diaz (@lorac328) November 12, 2024
Bezos defended his stance in an op-ed, urging the media to abandon partisan activism to restore credibility with the public. He also praised Trump’s political comeback and mandated an end to the paper’s remote work policies, a move that frustrated many employees.
Critics of the Post argue its recent guide exemplifies how out of touch the paper remains with ordinary Americans. While some opinion writers encourage reconnecting with the public, others continue to focus on progressive fears and divisive narratives.