A recent report reveals alarming shortcomings in the U.S. military’s readiness to face significant threats from major powers like China and Russia. The Commission on the National Defense Strategy highlighted numerous issues hampering the military’s ability to address these dangers effectively.
The report points out that the Department of Defense’s (DOD) outdated business practices, reliance on old military hardware, and complicated research methods are ill-suited for today’s strategic environment. These factors hinder the U.S. military’s capacity to respond to modern threats.
Additionally, the military faces recruitment challenges, leading to reduced numbers in the Army, Air Force, and Navy. This shortage further weakens the nation’s defense capabilities.
The report states, “The threats the United States faces are the most serious and most challenging the nation has encountered since 1945 and include the potential for near-term major war.” It warns that the U.S. is not prepared for a global conflict similar to World War II or the Cold War.
China, in particular, is identified as a major threat. The report notes that China is rapidly outpacing the U.S. in military investment, significantly shifting the balance of power in its favor, especially in the Western Pacific. China’s annual defense spending is estimated at $711 billion, with a 7.2% increase announced in March 2024.
Moreover, the report highlights the deepening partnership between China and Russia, which now includes military and economic collaborations with Iran and North Korea. This alignment poses a significant risk of a multi-theater or global war.
The U.S. defense industrial base is also criticized for being unable to meet the equipment and munitions needs of the U.S. and its allies. The report urges increased coordination and partnership with allies to boost industrial capacity.
To address these issues, the report recommends that Congress, the DOD, and other agencies work together to rewrite laws and regulations to remove barriers to innovation, budgeting, and procurement. It also suggests new authorities to promote jointness, strengthen the DOD workforce, and enhance national security.
